Scarlett Johansson

Takeshi Kitano

Michael Pitt

Pilou Asbæk

Chin Han

Juliette Binoche

Peter Ferdinando

Rila Fukushima

Daniel Henshall

Yutaka Izumihara

Anamaria Marinca

Kaori Momoi

Lasarus Ratuere

Danusia Samal

Tawanda Manyimo

Mana Hira Davis

Erroll Anderson

Kai Fung Rieck

Andrew Stehlin

Matthias Luafutu

John Luafutu

Kaori Yamamoto

Andrew Morris

Adwoa Aboah

Chris Obi

Makoto Murata

Natarsha Orsman

Joseph Naufahu

Vinnie Bennett

Pete Teo

Xavier Horan

Allan Henry

Bowie Chan Wing-Wai

Kirt Kishita

David Johnson Wood

Kate Venables

Emma Coppersmith

Tanya Drewery

Hannah Tasker-Poland

Jacqueline Lee Geurts

Shinji Ikefuji

Michael Wincott

Tricky

Philippe Joly

Yasushi Asaya

Jack Machiela

Jason Collins

Kurt Swanson

Bart Mueller

Rob Young

Rupert Sanders

Daniel Koene

Jamie Moss

Ari Arad

Avi Arad

Maguy R. Cohen

Mitsuhisa Ishikawa

Steven Paul

Jeffrey Silver

Mark Sourian

Lucy Bevan

Miranda Rivers

Jan Roelfs

Matt Austin

Simon Bright

Miro Harre

Richard L. Johnson

Andy McLaren

Erik Polczwartek

Greg Cockerill

Craig Poll

Nanw Rowlands

Leslee Feldman

Jess Hall

Elizabeth Willaman

Thomas Collier

Michael Diersing

Tom Kelly

Josue Clotaire Fleurimond

Scott Keery

Nick Komornicki

Patty Connolly

Libby Dempster

Jenny Rushton

Samantha Morley

Sarah Goodhue

Amy Barclay

Cécile Bouquet

Frédéric North

Dylan Goss

Raymond Lam Fai-Tai

Peter McCaffrey

Patrick Loungway

David Brown

Jonathan Spencer

Danny Williams

Matthew Ardine

Bob Gilles

Jasin Boland

David James

Tony Keddy

Troi Horton

Adrian Hebron

Bogdan Iofciulescu

Maude Rivard

Benoit Vervier

Kenn McDonald

Roy Malhi

Jérome Escobar

Damien Stumpf

Harrison Stark

Francis Leong

Matt McClurg

Irene Armit

Karthik Nidamarthi

Kyla Lebon

Jordan Pettersen

Hero Chev

Christopher Kowal

Anton Agerbo

Kim Menaster

Veronique Messier Lauzon

Philipp Wolf

Ryan Tudhope

Ivan Moran

Jason Billington

Axel Bonami

Jeri Baker

Vinnie Ashton

Cody Dysart

Stefan Knight

Jane O'Kane

Sarah Rubano

Michele Perry

Renee McCarthy

Katie Greathouse

Bryan Lawson

Kevin McKeever

Sam Zeines

Michelle Pazer

Daniel Saxlid

Dan O'Connell

Peter Michael Sullivan

Odin Benitez

Peter Staubli

Jon Title

Science Fiction

Drama

Action

Ghost in the Shell

Weying Galaxy Entertainment

Paramount Pictures

Shanghai Film Group

Reliance Entertainment

Grosvenor Park Productions

Steven Paul Production

Huahua Media

Seaside Entertainment

DreamWorks Pictures

Arad Productions

China

Hong Kong

India

United States of America

日本語

English

strong woman

hacker

philosophy

cyborg

dystopia

investigation

based on comic

female protagonist

cyberpunk

terrorism

evolution

intelligence officer

network

whitewashing

prosthesis

public security

I am writing this review as someone who hasn't seen the original anime. I have also been very critical of the whitewashing of this film. With that I aside, I went to see it with willingness to give it the benefit of the doubt. "Ghost in the Shell" is well...a beautiful shell. 

The visuals were absolutely breath taking. The action scenes flowed so beautifully with special effects. But that's all the movie had to offer. Take away the spectacles and you have a basic run-of-the-mill action movie. 

The acting was fine. But honestly, the leads didn't have anything to actually sink their teeth into. Scarjo, and everyone else, was serviceable. 

If you're looking for some mindless, yet stunning entertainment, then go see it.

I've watched Ghost in the Shell at the cinema 3 days ago, knowing
beforehand about the controversies that have surrounded this movie for
the last 6 months or so. Science fiction movies are probably my
favorite genre and I also enjoyed most of Scarlett's movies for the
past 8-9 years so those two factors were a plus for me going in. 

Regarding the whitewashing business, I think its been blown way, WAY
out of proportion by social justice warriors with nothing better to do
than drag media attention over whatever they're feeling insecure about
this month/year. For those of you who might be on the fence about
watching a Caucasian actress in the role that (supposedly) should've
been reserved to an Asian actress, please consider this a NON-MATTER
and watch it anyway. The character she is portraying is SUPPOSED to
look Caucasian/white. It was the same in the source material and even
the creator of that anime said so in interviews.

Now, is the movie any good? In my opinion, yes. Yes it was. It wasn't
amazing but at the very least entertaining. There is a good amount of
people who score this a 1/10 because they are butt hurt that the story
was changed a lot. Please ignore them and see for yourself even if
you're a fan of the anime and are able to keep an open mind. I think
maybe I was able to judge it more objectively because I had zero
knowledge about the story in the anime going in, but, if nothing else,
the movie actually made me want to watch those old ones to compare.

The acting - 7.5/10 - Since Scarlett Johansson is the only big name
that the movie is being marketed alongside, I'd say she did a good job.
At no point in the movie could I say she didn't belong there. She
played the part of cyborg who had difficulty belonging in a human world
very well. The cast is diverse enough in my opinion, though some of
them get pretty little screen time.

The visuals - 9/10 - If there is one point most critics/viewers are in
alignment concerning this movie, that point is definitely the visuals.
The movie both looks and feels spectacular, with the futuristic city
looking like a close-future mix of Blade Runner and TRON. The
combination of CGI and practical effects looks organic, the movie's
powerful themes of excessive self-augmentation and technology almost
running amok represented very well visually.

Soundtrack - 8/10 - Sometimes pretty subdued, sometimes
almost-but-not-quite in your face, I found the soundtrack to vary
between decent and very good in some moments. It didn't MAKE the movie
but it enhanced a good deal in my opinion.

Story - 7/10 - Here is where the good points of the movie kinda start
to run dry. A lot of other people would probably rate it a lot lower,
with 5 or 4's if they're at least trying to be objective. Yes, the
story is fairly predictable, and the fact that the movie is only around
100 minutes long doesn't do it any favors either. Here is probably
where most of the legitimate hate towards this movie stems from. The
creators adapted a story that had a lot more depth and philosophical
insight and turned it into a somewhat generic cyborg coming of age
story mixed with an evil corporation doing questionable things. The
villain is also very cookie-cutter and has almost zero depth. HOWEVER,
I do think that concerning this film's particular themes and narrative,
a weak villain doesn't hurt it so much since its more about
losing/gaining your humanity through technology than any bad guy trying
to shoot you.

Writing/Dialogue - 6/10 - By far the movie's weakest aspect. In fact, I
believe if some more meaningful dialogue and character interactions
were written into this film, it could've easily been 1 or 2 points
higher on anyone's scoring system. As it is, the dialogue is shallow
and fairly run-of-the-mill for about half the movie's length. Some bits
of good interactions are sprinkled here and there, and thankfully
that's enough to preserve the soul of the movie's central theme of
human souls surviving in machine bodies, BUT not enough to give Ghost
in the Shell the depth it should've inherited from the source material.

Overall - I gave this movie 3.5/5 stars here, mostly because I
couldn't give it a 7.5/10 which felt more appropriate to me. My advice
would be to not listen to the whitewashing nonsense, because that's
exactly what it is, nonsense. Also don't listen to the haters who rate
this movie a 1/10 or call it shit because those people should not be
reviewing anything to begin with. It is a decent movie, with great
visuals and a theme that might get you thinking for a couple of days
after seeing it. The acting is decent, with an above average
performance from Scarlett and a good soundtrack that might hit the
right spot on occasion. The only bad aspects, like I mentioned, are the
film's rather short running time and weak dialogue/writing which hold
it back from being truly great.

Gimly

I know I wasn't supposed to love it but I accidentally did.

_Final rating:★★★½ - I strongly recommend you make the time._

I boned up on this movie by watching the 1995 version and Stand Alone Complex for a bit, loved the repartée from Major Kusanagi and her crew and hoped it would translate to the big screen. The movie succeeds in displaying the setting and overall feel of the area. Everything is a grainy, low-tech with abundant neon and cyber-solidified humans. Sadly, the script is a bit of a mess. Kusanagi becomes Major Mira Killian (you'll see why toward the end the film) and Scarlett Johhansson, generally a quite credible actress, is sort of wasted here.

We do not get a lot of character development for her or her crewmates. There aren't a lot of quirky, funny moments as there are in the animated versions. Worse still, a lot of the teaser from the movie are just absent here, and one feels cheated. Overall this is a fine bit of popcorn absorption but fails to live up the series's standards and fails to give any of the actors much to work with. See it on a rainy day, if nothing else.

3.5/5

I was unable to make it to the theaters for this one due to traveling for work those first two weeks.  And then it was gone; couldn't find it in any theaters. I'm sure glad I didn't waste my money for that and only spent $1.62 to rent it from RedBox.
The trailer didn't show much, which is good.  I hate trailers that give away everything about a movie.  
So, a hot girl is always good...   
And it had the teaser nudity that isn't real but is a suit - I'll let you be the judge of that.
The rest is the same old overused nonsense from all other science fiction movies:
A lot of fighting, shooting, explosions and destruction - way too much of that... but just about all sci-fi and superhero movies these days only contain that.
The first hour was incredibly boring.  After about 70 minutes, it got just slightly interesting and then all the fighting/shooting/destruction began.  There is nothing interesting about that - we've all see that hundreds of times. It's ridiculous.
Why can't any of these shooters hit anything?  We still have that.  It isn't interesting to watch.  Thousands of rounds flying and everyone missing their target.  With all this high tech stuff, why don't they have more advanced weapons?
I have to say, I was in Arizona earlier this year and fired a handgun for the very first time.  It was a 6-shooter, a Colt "Peacemaker", you know the pistol of the "West".  You don't "AIM" those, you lift them to just above waist high, look at your target & not the gun, and pull the trigger. After just a few shots, it starts to become very natural. Any sane person can hit a target the size of a person at least somewhere on their body, even if they are moving.  24 rounds: I had 24 hits & 0 misses at various distances. But the people in these movies can't hit anything even when they do aim and with much better weapons.  
And then you have Major, her manufactured body can stretch & tear, wires breaking, and it can still function?  Uh, NO, it wouldn't.  That's not how mechanics and electronics work.
The City: a ridiculous "Blade Runner"/"Fifth Element" type of city but with fish floating around.  No, not interesting at all. Just very silly.
Oh, one petty but very annoying thing: They can build an entire body and install a human brain in it and get everything to work but they can only give her a ragged, jagged wig or haircut?  That's very weird.  Her crooked bangs were a distraction in every scene that included her facing the viewer.

In Summary: This movie has a lot of awesome CGI with a ridiculous plot and horrible acting.  Great CGI alone doesn't make a great, or even a good, movie.  This catastrophe is a perfect example of that.

Per Gunnar Jonsson

This is an okay movie but that is about it. The blurb sounded quite interesting and the trailers were promising even though I always take trailers with a huge pinch of salt. I have never read the original Manga. Whether that is good or bad with respect to the movie I do not know.

The good stuff as far as this movie is concerned is, not surprisingly, the visuals. I would not say that they are stunning but the are quite good. The environments are interesting and the special effects are not bad at all. I have to say that the tank design was pretty poor though. Not very exiting as a fictional design and utter nonsense from a functional point of view.

This is as far as the good stuff goes. The story is okay but it is pretty predictable and not that much to get exited about. It could have been more developed for sure. I would actually have liked to see the Major do a few more missions beating up the bad guys. That was where the movie shined a bit and showed the best visuals and special effects.

The acting is pretty mediocre to be honest. Even Daisuke Aramaki, which was a character that I did like, felt rather bland. The main bad guy was just a uninspiring thug.

To me the movie more or less felt like the pilote episode of a TV-show with a huge budget for visuals. It was not WOW god but showed promise and I felt like I would like to see more “episodes”. The fact that it is actually a movie and it seems unlikely that a sequel, even though the ending makes it pretty clear that they hoped there would be one, will be made left me with a unsatisfied feeling.

Bottom line, average movie with enjoyable visuals and special effects but one which do not manage to reach above the “just another sci-fi manga movie” segment for me.

Reno

**Too late to come out to impress its fans!**

It was not my most anticipated film of the year. Like usual for any film, I just wanted to see it and enjoy it. The film was fine, but that does not mean so good. From the visuals to the performances, it sounded great. But the story wasn't. When the original concept was created nearly 30 years back, it fascinated people for being something new and powerful. But for the current world, for the current generation, it is just an ordinary sci-fi. All I say is it just came out at least 15 years late. So the 90s kids would have loved it!

The storyline was nothing, but a self-discovery of a half human, half machine. This has been the plot of hundreds of robot films. But it's just differently told. One of only kind, a human brain was saved after the severe accident and given an artificial body. Now she's known as Major fights the crime. But some day later, she's haunted by glitches in her vision which directly connected to her past that she does not remember. The rest of the film was finding the truth and other consequences, before it all ends.

Visual effects were the only advantage for this film to come out in the present era. The rest of the film was simply okayish. I don't know what the original source fans say about it, but it is a one time watchable film. Otherwise, there are plenty of similar good films, like this is nothing much different than 'Robocop'. Or the recent TV series 'Westworld'. Scarlett Johansson could become a reason for some people to peek into it. The writing and direction were average. Watch and forget kind of film.

_5/10_

Ghost in the Shell | Trailer #2 | Paramount Pictures International

Ghost in the Shell | Trailer #1 | Paramount Pictures International

Ghost in the Shell | Featurette: "Mamoru Oshii" | Paramount Pictures International

Ghost in the Shell( 2017)

There's nothing sadder than a puppet without a ghost.

Overview

Top Billed Cast

Social

A review by Salt-and-Limes

Written by Salt-and-Limes on Sun Apr 02 2017

Media

Recommendations

Facts

Status

Original Language

Budget

Revenue

Keywords